Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Blessed are the Peacemakers

| 1 Comment

The dichotomy I observe between the two candidates is ultimately between the concepts of WAR and PEACE. One thinks that a STRONG military (or illusion of it without a mandatory draft) is the best way to solve the word's problems and the other thinks that there can be a peaceful, multilateral solution. One thinks that the "free market", dominated by private corporations with the ultimate reward of a magnanimous profit (for a select few) is the only way to achieve a stable society. The other thinks that dialogue, negotiation and a distribution of wealth is possible and the best way to resolve our country's problems. These are the basic concepts that tend go beyond the realm of ordinary people who do not care about the real reasons we go to war or remain "at peace" with nations. Most of us are too busy paying our credit card bills and don't have much at stake except our rising interest rates. That's at shame. I won't get into the politics of war or peace right now or how it disgusts me to realize how we have become a nation of narcissists. I only must say that the more we spend on war, the less we will have to spend on healthcare. In our country, and in our political system, the President sets his agenda in the "State of the Union" speech. That's how it works. Whoever is elected will set the tone and spending priorities for the next four years. One of our candidates thinks military spending is the best way to achieve peace and create a better, safer society. The other candidate believes that dialogue, negotiation for peace and better healthcare for U.S. citizens will lead to a more viable solution and a better, safer society and world. Whoever is elected will direct our budget to those priorities. We can't afford both. It's doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. It only takes a few minutes to pay attention to the issues. In simple terms, war is expensive. It is also very lucrative to the industries that fund war. Healthcare is also very lucrative. The pharmaceutical industry, private insurance industry and AMA (American Medical Association) invest large amounts of "resources" (campaign contributions) to influence legislation that will benefit their interests.

"War", whether it be between the U.S. and another country or between the U.S. industries and the citizens who they rely on for profit is GOOD BUSINESS. But will we ever resolve our problems or be at peace with our adversaries without the commitment and resolve of all of us? Are we too busy and self absorbed to care, vote, read, write or voice our opinions?

It seems that we've gotten used to war. War has been an acceptable means of resolving problems. There is no real sacrifice for most Americans. We don't have a draft, so it's relatively easy to "support our troops". But, where is the discussion about HIV/AiDS between the candidates? I've heard that there is finally going to be a public debate between the two candidates in August.

I regret to admit that I sincerely believe that there won't be too much time spent on the issues or policies of HIV/AIDS. I hope there is. I hope they will discuss the past eight years of flat funding, the increase of infections and the complete failure of "abstinence" programs. I anticipate that most of the debate will be spent talking about "war". I want our leaders to finally talk about making healthcare affordable to all Americans, "peace" for our country and the world and how we can achieve it.

"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God". Have any of these war mongers and profiteers really read the bible as they profess to have done?" I have serious doubts that they --- or our country --- really cares about anything else but war and its funding. I hope to God I'm wrong.

1 Comment

Show Comment(s)

Comments on Annette Lizzul's blog entry "Blessed are the Peacemakers"

Peace, Love, and free healthcare for everyone. Yes it would be nice, but unfortunately in the real world there is a thing called the law of supply and demand. It has been rumored that Democrats would like to repeal this law. I think most Dems do believe in the law of supply and demand but they buy votes from the poor and uneducated by selling the notion that the law does not exist. Very sad.
On another note I would like to say I have had wonderful success with abstinence,I have not infected anyone in the 20 years I have known of my status. I refuse to believe that humans can't control their actions and that individuals are not responsible for their own actions. As a parent I can tell you my kids knew about HIV and how not to get long before they even knew what sex was. Fucking weird. Now as a parent of a teacher I can also tell you kids know how to avoid getting HIV. What most here refuse to understand is that it takes time for people to change. No amount of taxpayer dollars is gonna change that. People will start having safe sex when they see their friends and people they know dying or struggling with hiv.
What do you consider more addicting,sex or tobacco? I think sex is probably more addictive. Look how long it took for people to cut back on smoking,in fact there are still people out there killing themselves everyday of week,even though people know it kills. Government throwing money at prevention only works for so long and in the end people change habits so they can live,not because of Fed meddling or free rubbers.

Leave a comment



Archives

 

My Favorite Links

Subscribe to Blog

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Annette published on July 24, 2008 11:46 PM.

"SEND LAWYERS, GUNS AND MONEY" was the previous entry in this blog.

The Ties That Bind is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed by the bloggers and by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong and/or its employees.

Smart + Strong is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information contained in the blogs or within any comments posted to the blogs.



© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy