Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Visit:
Forums
POZ TV
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

Indiana Wants YOU!

| 5 Comments
(Sound of police sirens}

Mmm mm-mmmm-mm
Mmm mm-mmmm-mm

Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
I wish I had you to talk to

If a man ever needed dyin', he did
No one had the right to say what he said about you
And it's so cold and lonely here without you
Out there the law's a-comin'
I'm scared and so tired of runnin'

Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
I wish I had you to talk to

It hurts to see the man that I've become
And to know I'll never see the morning sun shine on the land
I'll never see your smilin' face or touch your hand
If just once more I could see
You, our home, and our little baby

Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
{police sirens}
I wish I had you to talk to

I hope this letter finds its way to you
Forgive me, Love, for the shame I put you through and all the tears
Hang on, Love, to the memories of those happy years
Red lights are flashin' around me
Yeah, Love, it looks like they found me

Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
Indiana wants me
Lord, I can't go back there
I wish I had you to talk to

Indiana wants me (this is the police, you are surrounded)
Lord, I can't go back there (give yourself up)
Indiana wants me (this is the police, give yourself up)
Lord, I can't go back there (you are surrounded)

{shoot-out sound effects}

Indiana Wants Me by R. Dean Taylor (1976)


Having sex - protected or unprotected - with another human being, without telling him or her that you have HIV is morally wrong. It shouldn't be a crime, however, unless you actually transmit the virus.  

As recently reported in POZ, Indiana resident Tony M. Perkins (presumably NOT the actor who portrayed Norman Bates in "Psycho",) pleaded guilty to felony charges for failing to tell any of his 26 girlfriends - most of whom he apparently met on a cheesy website called "plentyoffish.com", and none of whom have tested positive for HIV - that he has our virus. The official Indiana Superior Court charging document asserted that Perkins violated Indiana statute I.C. 35-42-1-9(b) and L.C. 16-41-7-1, which purportedly make it a felony for a "carrier" not to warn that he/she has HIV.

Oddly enough, neither of the two statutes cited in the Indiana court documents actually states that failing to warn sex partners about one's HIV is a felony. Nonetheless, Perkins copped a plea and is waiting to be sentenced.

In my view, the Indiana police prosecuted Perkins for being irresponsible under the guise of a law that didn't actually apply - the statutes cited in the court documents have no language that support the charges. But they persecuted him for being HIV positive, and that, my friends, is a tragedy.

Knowing that you will go to jail if you fail to tell your partner that you have HIV and then give it to him/her should be enough to deter reckless conduct. Having the state punish you for keeping your secret, without transmitting the disease, is wrong.

Possible Hep C Cure?

| 2 Comments

Researchers have identified two cellular proteins that are important factors in hepatitis C virus infection, a finding that may result in the approval of new and less toxic treatments for the disease, which can lead to liver cancer and cirrhosis.

An estimated 270 to 300 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C and the conventional treatments - interferon and ribavirin - can have significant side effects. A new drug targeting cellular proteins rather than viral proteins would be a valuable addition to the treatment arsenal, said Samuel French, an assistant professor of pathology and senior author of the study.

French and his team set out to identify the cellular factors involved in hepatitis C replication and, using mass spectrometry, found that heat shock proteins (HSPs) 40 and 70 were important for viral infection. HSP 70 was previously known to be involved, but HSP 40 was linked for the first time to hepatitis C infection, French said. They further showed that the natural compound Quercetin, which inhibits the synthesis of these proteins, significantly inhibits viral infection in tissue culture.

"This is an important finding because we can block these proteins with the idea of reducing the level of the virus in people and, ideally, completely eliminate it," said French, who also is a researcher at UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center.

The study appeared in the most recent issue of the journal Hepatology.

Since Quercetin has been shown to inhibit hepatitis C infection, French said, a Phase I clinical trial will be launched at UCLA to determine if the compound is safe and effective.

Quercetin is a plant-derived bioflavonoid, and is used by some people as a nutritional supplement. Laboratory studies show it may have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and it is being investigated for a wide range of potential health benefits. Currently, there are early-stage clinical trials testing quercetin for safety and efficacy against sarcoidosis, asthma and glucose absorption in obesity and diabetes.

"Because Quercetin targets cellular proteins rather than viral proteins, there is less likelihood of developing viral resistance," French said. "Cellular proteins cannot change like viral proteins can."

Many patients in the United States have a type of hepatitis C virus that does not respond to the standard treatments. In these cases, if the virus can't be blocked, end-stage liver disease and, ultimately, death may occur. Once HSP 40 and 70 were identified, French and his team used Quercetin in an attempt to block the proteins and found that the compound "reduced infectious particle production at non-toxic concentrations," according to the study.

"Quercetin may allow for the dissection of the viral life cycle and has potential therapeutic use to reduce virus production with low associated toxicity," the study states.

The UCLA clinical trial will most likely target those with type 1 hepatitis C, which is the non-responsive type prevalent in this country. Only about 50 percent of those with type 1 hepatitis C respond to treatment, French said.

Volunteers with type 1 hepatitis C who opt not to undergo conventional therapies would be recruited for the study. In other studies in other diseases, Quercetin has resulted in no significant side effects, French said.

"A non-toxic treatment for chronic hepatitis C would be great because our current therapies have significant side effects and only a certain percentage of the patient population responds," French said.

Source: University of California - Los Angeles

Quercetin is widely available at GNC and other health food stores. My Hep C (type 4) resisted the standard interferon/ribavirin treatment two years ago so I'll begin taking the Quercetin as soon as it arrives. Will it work? We'll see...


The Dawn Patrol

| No Comments
sneakers.jpg5 a.m.: The light of dawn is barely visible in the eastern sky, but the roosters have already begun to crow and our dogs, Pepper, Robin and Brownie, are eager to take me out to Tulubhan Beach for their morning run. I have no choice in the matter - the dogs are determined to go and they take turns pawing at my arms.

I pull on a pair of shorts and flip-flops ( the island fashion) and lift my heavy staff from its resting place near the bedside. The staff was carved for me by a local artist from molave wood and is hard enough to shatter bone. The dogs watch me lift it and run excitedly down to the gate of our compound, waiting for me to open it so they can charge down the road to the beach.

The wind is "amihan" now, blowing over the tidal flats from the eastern Philippine sea, thick with the scent of salt and seaweed. Its a long way from New York City. Will I ever return to the U.S.? Probably not. While I might be pursuaded to fly back to North America to defend an appropriate case involving HIV/AIDS criminalization*, I'm finished with my law  practice. I recently turned 59, and after living with HIV for 30 years, I don't know how much time I have left. It's time to kick back and watch the sunrise.

 I became a legal resident of Sweden, where Eva's family lives, last spring. The health care system in Sweden is far superior to that of the country that I left behind. All Swedish citizens and permanent residents receive health care, and its just as good or better than the health care available in the U.S.

The health care debate would be almost amusing if it weren't so sad. There are those in Congress who seem determined to prevent Americans living with HIV and other serious diseases from receiving adequate health care. Its a sorry state of affairs dominated by lobbyists for the U.S. health care industry who employ fear and misinformation to prevent change and I wonder if Washington will ever manage to give change the system...

Oy!

| No Comments
KESN0CAJ1EPAZCAVIDBDYCAY7JAN5CALAGUIYCAB0DHABCAQEHKZZCARZI0L7CANUEY8NCA91UV18CA5REVJFCANP69L9CA07N09TCAA950L2CAS3NYP7CA7BK5O2CAGE44LICAL9JMACCA988XPMCAMU46BJ.jpg
Sony Pictures will make a fortune, but will anyone be around to spend it?

Here's the trailer:   2012 - The Movie

Read This Book!

| 1 Comment
crumbx.jpgOne of my best friends, David Colton, has written an interview with R.Crumb. Read it at
http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2009-10-18-r-crumb-old-testament_N.htm.


If someone will mail me a copy of the book, I will allow him to walk our dogs at 6 a.m.

Uh...

| 2 Comments
It's six a.m. Our dogs are barking, my girlfriend is snoring (quietly!), and a mosquito just bit my ear. Does this mean the apocalypse is near? Will the environment collapse? Will Obama and our government manage to reform health care? Will the Yankees win the world series?

So many questions...

I'm going back to sleep.

Roman Polansky, in Brief...

| 5 Comments
Is Roman Polansky's arrest and extradition a tragedy? Probably - he is a talented filmmaker, but I've never known a 13 year old girl (or boy) mature enough to deal with the emotional consequences of a sexual relationship with an adult, and although there may be exceptions children need to be protected by the law. I would hope that the consequences of his conviction are reasonable in view of the particular circumstances of the child and what occurred. The victim, now grown, wants the case dismissed. If that is truly what she wants, it should be honored.

Vaccine Progress?

| 1 Comment

For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scientists to think such a vaccine might never be possible.

The vaccine cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by more than 31 per cent in the world's largest AIDS vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok.

Even though the benefit is modest, "it's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine," Col. Jerome Kim said in a telephone interview. He helped lead the study for the U.S. Army, which sponsored it with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

The institute's director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned that this is "not the end of the road," but said he was surprised and very pleased by the outcome.

"It gives me cautious optimism about the possibility of improving this result" and developing a more effective AIDS vaccine, Dr. Fauci said in a telephone interview. "This is something that we can do."

Even a marginally helpful vaccine could have a big impact. Every day, 7,500 people worldwide are newly infected with HIV; 2 million died of AIDS in 2007, the UN agency UNAIDS estimates.

"Today marks an historic milestone," said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, an international group that has worked toward developing a vaccine.

"It will take time and resources to fully analyze and understand the data, but there is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field," he said in a statement.

The Thailand Ministry of Public Health conducted the study, which used strains of HIV common in Thailand. Whether such a vaccine would work against other strains in the U.S., Africa or elsewhere in the world is unknown, scientists stressed.

"This is a scientific breakthrough," Thai Health Minister Witthaya Kaewparadai told a news conference in Bangkok. "For the first time ever there is evidence that HIV vaccine has preventative efficacy."

The study actually tested a two-vaccine combo in a "prime-boost" approach, where the first one primes the immune system to attack HIV and the second one strengthens the response.

They are ALVAC, from Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of French drug maker Sanofi-Aventis; and AIDSVAX, originally developed by VaxGen Inc. and now held by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, a nonprofit founded by some former VaxGen employees.

ALVAC uses canarypox, a bird virus altered so it can't cause human disease, to ferry synthetic versions of three HIV genes into the body. AIDSVAX contains a genetically engineered version of a protein on HIV's surface. The vaccines are not made from whole virus - dead or alive - and cannot cause HIV.

Neither vaccine in the study prevented HIV infection when tested individually in earlier trials, and dozens of scientists had called the new one futile when it began in 2003.

"I really didn't have high hopes at all that we would see a positive result," Dr. Fauci confessed.

The results proved the skeptics wrong.

"The combination is stronger than each of the individual members," said Col. Kim.

The study tested the combo in HIV-negative Thai men and women ages 18 to 30 at average risk of becoming infected. Half received four "priming" doses of ALVAC and two "boost" doses of AIDSVAX over six months. The others received dummy shots. No one knew who got what until the study ended.

All were given condoms, counselling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines.

Participants were followed for three years after vaccination ended.

Results: New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 per cent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group.

The vaccine had no effect on levels of HIV in the blood of those who did become infected. That had been another goal of the study - seeing whether the vaccine could limit damage to the immune system and help keep infected people from developing full-blown AIDS.

That result is "one of the most important and intriguing findings of this trial," Dr. Fauci said. It suggests that the signs scientists have been using to gauge whether a vaccine was actually giving protection may not be valid.

"It is conceivable that we haven't even identified yet" what really shows immunity, which is both "important and humbling" after decades of vaccine research, Dr. Fauci said.

Details of the $105-million study will be given at a vaccine conference in Paris in October.

This is the third big vaccine trial since 1983, when HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS. In 2007, Merck & Co. stopped a study of its experimental vaccine after seeing it did not prevent HIV infection. Later analysis suggested the vaccine might even raise the risk of infection in certain men. The vaccine itself did not cause infection.

In 2003, AIDSVAX flunked two large trials - the first late-stage tests of any AIDS vaccine at the time.

It is unclear whether vaccine makers will seek to license the two-vaccine combo in Thailand. Before the trial began, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said other studies would be needed before the vaccine could be considered for U.S. licensing.

Also unclear is whether Thai volunteers who received dummy shots will now be offered the vaccine. Researchers had said they would do so if the vaccine showed clear benefit - defined as reducing the risk of infection by at least 50 per cent.

Those issues, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Col. Kim said. Scientists want to know how long will protection last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial.

The study was done in Thailand because U.S. Army scientists did pivotal research in that country when the AIDS epidemic emerged there, isolating virus strains and providing genetic information on them to vaccine makers. The Thai government also strongly supported the idea of doing the study.


From /www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/vaccine-helps-prevent-hiv-infection/article1299462/

Happy Anniversary?

| 1 Comment
anniversary_cake1.jpgIt's 4:30 a.m. here in Helsingborg. A dense mist is hovering in the early light over the Oresund channel between Sweden and Denmark. I can't sleep.

In January of 1980, I woke up one morning with a strange, pasty sensation in my mouth. I stumbled into the bathroom and looked into the mirror. My tongue was white. My doctor at the time, Lenny, told me it was a yeast infection. A yeast infection? On my tongue?

Larry wrote me a prescription for Monistat tablets. I don't know if Monistat is still being prescribed today, but in 1980, Monistat was the drug of choice for vaginal yeast infections. I didn't have a vagina, and I'd broken up with my girlfriend and cleaned up my act back in August, so I had to wonder how the hell I'd suddenly acquired the lingual overcoat. I'd had some mild flu-like aches and fever a few weeks earlier, but I didn't connect it with the yeast infection, which happily responded to the Monistat.

That was almost 30 years ago. 30 years with HIV. 30 years, and I'm still here.

Wish I could sleep...



(Check out my website, Davidweissny.com, which I've been busy revising for the last two hours!)

Got HIV? You're Still Excludable!

| 5 Comments
Uncle Sam Wants You.jpgLast year, the Bush Administration's PEPFAR bill was to have eliminated the HIV travel ban. The bill was signed into law. But that wasn't the end of the ban.

The final step in removing the policy of excluding those with HIV required the Department of Health and Human Services  to remove HIV from its regulation listing "communicable diseases of public health significance." (42 CFR 34.2(b).) That's not what happened.

On April 10, 2009, HHS forwarded regulations to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. As of now, visitors to the U.S. will still be asked whether they have HIV. They will then be asked to sign the following certification:



I certify that:

    a) I do not currently show symptoms indicative of an active AIDS-related condition that is
contagious or that requires urgent treatment.

    b) I am aware of, understand, and have been counseled on the nature and severity of my
medical condition. I am also aware of and have been counseled on the communicability of my
medical condition, including the fact that I must not donate blood or blood components.

    c) I am knowledgeable of the routes of transmission of HIV, including sexual contact, sharing needles, and blood transfusions, and understand that I must avoid these activities to minimize the danger of transmission of the infection to any other person in the United States.
  
    d) If I have been prescribed antiretroviral drugs, I have access to an adequate supply for my
anticipated stay in the United States.

    e) I possess sufficient assets or insurance, acceptable in the United States, to cover any medical care that I may require in the event of illness at any time while in the United States. Therefore, I will not create any cost to the United States, or a State or local government, or any agency thereof, without the prior written consent of that agency.
   
    f) I am seeking admission solely for activities that are consistent with B-1 (business visitor) or B-2 (visitor for pleasure) nonimmigrant classifications.
  
   g) I understand that I am not eligible to seek admission under section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allows some visitors from specified countries to be admitted without visas.
  
    h) I understand and agree that no single admission to the United States will be for more than 30 days.
  
     In signing below,  I understand that I am waiving the opportunity to apply for any extension of nonimmigrant stay (except under the appropriate circumstances, at its discretion the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may grant an additional period of stay before satisfactory departure), a change of nonimmigrant status, or adjustment of status to that of permanent resident (except in asylum cases), whether filed affirmatively with DHS or defensively in response to an action for removal. I understand and agree that any failure to comply with conditions of admission will result in a permanent inability to apply for the benefits of this provision.

___________________
(Applicant's Signature)


At first glance, the procedure doesn't seem so bad; it merely asks if you are positive,  and if you disclose the truth, that you assure the government that you'll exercise a little caution, right?  But why are we asked about HIV at all? And who reviews these forms after they are submitted? Can  HIV+ travelers still be banned from entering the U.S.? 

The simple fact is that we are still being subjected to institutional scrutiny, and there are no guidelines or limits to the authority of the immigration agents who review the disclosure forms. You can still be excluded  from the U.S.because you have HIV

Has Obama betrayed us? Why are there still any HIV+ travel restrictions? One can only conclude that our government still assumes that there are a significant number of HIV+ men and/or women who might spread HIV through carelessness or worse, intentionally. It assumes that we can't be trusted.
As a result
, no U.S. Government agency has published a definitive rule that prohibits itself or its employees from excluding HIV+ visitors.

This isn't the first time that America has marginalized a suspect minority. In 1944,  In Korematsu v. United States,  the U.S. Supreme Court agreed that it was perfectly fine and dandy to relocate Japanese-Americans to protect the country from saboteurs and spies for the public good. Despite much criticism, including a "proclamation" by President Gerald R. Ford in 1976 that the segregation of Japanese-Americans was wrong, Korematsu remains the law today.  

So what can we do about it? Do the numbers support this de facto AIDS apartheid? Is it fair to assume that we are a public health risk? Uncle Sam seems to think so. Unfortunately, and unless our voices are heard, he'll keep pointing a finger of suspicion and stigma at all of us.



David H Weiss is an attorney admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of New York and the United States. He has been living with HIV for almost 30 years. His website, which is desperately in need of an update, can be viewed at DavidWeissNY.com


Archives

 

My Favorite Links

Subscribe to Blog

Powered by MT-Notifier

Recent Comments

  • DJ: I think it is just as criminal for anyone to read more
  • Living: I think someone should be prosecuted if they knowing past read more
  • R. : Unfortunately, the prospect that you may transmit the virus is read more
  • Terry: To "blackchicago40", I'm out to everyone about my HIV status; read more
  • blackchicago40: Now we are constantly being told that we have to read more
  • David: Quercetin is available online at most of the reputable vitamin read more
  • ron kennedy: please let me know how to do what your doing read more
  • Online Auction: HI Good information about this book and there are many read more
  • Abia the Cat: We watch Gunsmoke every afternoon on WGN (Chicago). I'm sure read more
  • Tuliza: Sometimes too much wondering can get you wandering off your read more

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages