Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:

And the Dalai Lama farts

| 2 Comments

riots.jpg





























Sept. 15:  The rioting in response to a film that is said to have satirized Muhammed is as much an indictment of Islam as it may be of humanity. Why do they not understand that NO "religious" belief - or its "prophet", is of such importance that it justifies this kind of behavior? If this is who we are, then we deserve whatever apocalyptic end awaits mankind, whether it comes in 2012 or fifty years from now.

In the words of Aldous Huxley (who was one of the great visionaries of our time) "anybody who gets eloquent about Buddha, or God, or Christ, ought to have his mouth washed out with carbolic soap". The same applies to Muhammed, whose shit smelled as bad in his day as mine does today.

Jesus Christ had bad teeth and premature ejaculations. Gandhi slept with half the babes in India. Obama smoked weed and Gautama was a freak. We're all just human.

You may find this post offensive, but Philip Pullman, (a writer whose books I have admittedly not read), got it right when he said that: "It was a shocking thing to say and I knew it was a shocking thing to say. But no one has the right to live without being shocked. No one has the right to spend their life without being offended. Nobody has to read this. But if you read it, you don't have to like it. And if you read it and you dislike it, you don't have to remain silent about it. You can write to me, you can complain about it, you can write to the publisher, you can write to the papers, you can write your own book. You can do all those things, but there your rights stop. No one has the right to stop me writing this. No one has the right to stop it being published, or sold, or bought, or read."

I'd put it this way: We should never be fanatical about our belief that others should not be fanatical about theirs, except when they would impose their fanaticism on us. When that happens, we all lose.

One of my old friends argues that certain statements or behavior can be like yelling fire in the theatre, and to some extent, he is correct. But freedom is a very big deal; do we really want to live in a world where you can only say certain things (or love certain people?) That's what the current crises is really about. That's why it matters.

So yes - Muhammed was a sexist pig, the Dalai Lama farts, and Gandhi may have slept with all those young women in India.




2 Comments

Show Comment(s)

Comments on David Weiss's blog entry "And the Dalai Lama farts"

I aggree with you that fanatics tend to get out of hand and bring about violence and misery in the name of religion. Its horrible and unbecoming of a humanity.
But did you know that Gandhi, Jesus and the Buddha all opposed violence and hatred as well as organized religion ? Some religion were created by power hungry men who wanted to capitalize on the teachings of these three men and other such goodpeople as well.In their attempts to control people and become wealthy, they deliberately misinterpreted scripture to suite their own wicked beliefs. In the chaos and atrocities that resulted, Jesus, Buddha and Gandi (as well as Islam) all got bad names. Hate mongers take the teachigs of good people, twist them round and then commit murder in the name of the good person. If I taught people to love one another and then in time, hate mongers twisted my teachings and killed in my name, does that make me a bad person ? It saddens me how atheists believe that God is non-exsistant just because idiots created hate based reigions. Jesus was always warning people to be wary of religious teachers. I bet you didn't know that. Gandhi once said "I respect the teachings of the Christ but most christians are so unlike him."
Has it ever accurred to you that "God" and "goodness" are simply one and the same and that anything that isn't good is not about of God? Yes, Gandhi, Jesus and the Buddha did have the same bodily functions as you so disrespectfully pointed out. But they are not responsible for the hatred and violence commited in their names. Nor is God.

Your reaction is somewhat diffuse, Duran. You plaud the goodness of these historic men and agree that religious fanaticism is not what they taught (although that may necessarily be true,) while seemingly taking offense at a blog post in which one or more of these men were illuminated by their humanity - a reaction that one might fairly characterize as a bit fanatical. Nonetheless, I respect your individual right to express it and will not be issuing a fatwa to avenge my good name.

Leave a comment



Archives

 

My Favorite Links

Subscribe to Blog

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David published on September 14, 2012 10:12 PM.

FOR SALE: One soul, slightly used. was the previous entry in this blog.

Aftermath is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed by the bloggers and by people providing comments are theirs alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Smart + Strong and/or its employees.

Smart + Strong is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information contained in the blogs or within any comments posted to the blogs.



© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved. Terms of use and Your privacy